Casio WSD-F10 Android Wear Smartwatch Review

By: Salah Benkahla

Just a few years ago, I never thought I'd be wearing a Casio smartwatch on my wrist, so I have to say that it brings me pleasure to review the 2016 Casio WSD-F10 that runs Android Wear. I recall a meeting with some of the brand's own dedicated employees who seriously questioned the value of smartwatches in the context of "connected wearable technology devices." Undoubtedly, companies like Casio - who, in their own opinions, "have been building smartwatches for years" - harbor their own ideas and notions about what consumers want and how smartwatches should behave and look.

By mid-2015, there was still no word of an official Casio smartwatch, and it prompted me to write anessay on what a Casio smartwatch should be like in May of that year. I did that because I felt the popular Japanese "technology watch" maker was in a fantastic position to create an amazing smartwatch product. Less than a year later, in January of 2016, Casio finally did it, and announced their first official connected smartwatch with the WSD-F10 here.
This now puts me in a unique situation because I'm reviewing a product that I made a wish list for prior to it ever being announced. The question, then, becomes: did Casio live up to my own personal expectations in terms of its seminal smartwatch product? And, more importantly, where do they go from here?


In essence, the Casio WSD-F10 runs Google's Android Wear operating system platform, using their own case and screen hardware, as well as a few other little interesting features that make the watch different from other smartwatches out there. For most consumers, the real allure of the Casio WSD-F10 will be its superior durability over many other smartwatches, as well as the inclusion of various built-in sensor technology that Casio fans have come to expect in models coming from the Pro Trek or G-Shock family. I happen to like the fact that the Casio WSD-F10 is among Casio's products that is produced in Japan - whereas most smartwatches are produced in China.


Fit and finish for the Casio WSD-F10 is very good. It isn't a G-Shock in terms of overall durability, but it feels like one of the better-made plastic Casio watches with a premium feel and great textures on the case. If I had to make any complaints about the case itself, it would be that it is very large in size, and that the charging port (located at 10 o'clock) feels a bit "exposed."
With that said, case size is as big as it is probably because of the battery. Remember that in the smartwatch world batteries are currently the weakest link, and brands need to use amply sized batteries contained in the cases so as to ensure at least a day's worth of wear. I will, however, say that despite the rather massive proportions of the Casio WSD-F10, it is very comfortable. How is that so? Well, the watch doesn't weigh that much at just 93 grams, so you don't even really feel it there, and the strap happens to fit quite snugly too.


The Casio WSD-F10 is 56.4mm wide, 61.7mm tall, and 15.7mm thick. As a sporty outdoors watch, this is fine, but don't be the guy trying to wear this with anything even remotely formal. Since the Pro Trek, Casio has made it clear that its outdoors watches are made for where suits should never go. As of now, Casio offers the WSD-F10 in a metallic orange-colored body (WSD-F10RG) as well as this black one (WSD-F10BK)... and also a red (WSD-F10RD) and green model (WSD-F10GN), for now. I prefer the black, as it helps visually reduce mass, and the orange one looks too much like a toy for big boys. When you have a watch this size, you don't need to call extra attention to its girth.
Casio designed the case with three buttons, two of which are proprietary to Casio's systems over Android Wear. The middle button that is located where the crown would be is the "home" button which activates the screen or takes you back to the home screen. The other two buttons are actually semi-programmable and allow you to select from a series of apps that they can launch - which proves quite useful.

As much as I love touchscreen on devices (and I say this as someone who desperately misses physical keyboards on smartphones... oh Blackberry, why did you have to leave the land of the relevant?), I find physical buttons to be very (very) useful. Not only can you feel for them with your fingers and not have to look at what you are doing, but they also tend to not suffer from things like lag and other issues which come from "virtual buttons." while I agree that smartwatches need touchscreens, I really dislike the "de-buttonification" of technology because, frankly, I hate shoving my oiling fingers on the screen that I am otherwise trying to actually look at. I remember the first time I was prompted to play a game on a smartphone, and was like, "you are telling me that the direction controls and buttons overlap the screen I am trying to look at?" Talk about intrusive UI...
Anyhow, I say all of the above in part as praise for Casio adding a couple more buttons to the Android Wear formula - and I hope in the future we get even more buttons. Buttons, buttons galore is all this smartwatch lover wants for the holidays! The top button is labeled "Tool," and it controls a variety of Casio-made apps which mostly focus around the sensors that the watch has internally. This is great because it isn't using data from the phone, which increases the wrist watch's autonomy.

Press the Tool button and you can cycle through various app screens. In the "Casio Moment Setter+" app that you need to download on your phone, you can adjust the various apps you cycle through and remove some or rearrange them. For me, pressing the Tool button initially opens up the compass app. You can then access other apps such as the barometer, altimeter, and sunset and sunrise times, along with various graphs about your treks and adventures. Casio designed all the graphical user interface of these apps, and I think they are for the most part nicely done. Colorful and modern, they even evoke what feels like a new design language from the brand.

The inclusion of the compass, barometer, and altimeter sensors in the Casio WSD-F10 not only helps this watch be a "real" Casio sports watch, but also helps distinguish it from the crowd. I am a huge proponent of smartwatches that have their own sensors and don't just rely on those from the host phone device. Where some consumers might find the watch lacking is the absence of features such as a heart rate monitor, etc., that timepieces such as the Apple Watch have. With that said, Casio intends for the WSD-F10 and future smartwatches to speak with other devices and sensors. For example, when the Casio WSD-F10 launched, so did a jacket-mounted body reference EX-FR100 camera that you can control with the watch. This accessory isn't sold officially in America, but when I was traveling in Japan in February 2016 the Casio EX-FR100 was for sale all over the place. Like other brands which offer additional fitness accessories, I have a feeling the universe of companion products could easily grow.

The other button on the case is located at 4 o'clock and is labeled "App." Slightly more flexible in its customization, you use the Casio Moment Setter+ app to select a large range of installed applications that this button can launch. For me, I have it set to launch a weather application. While I really like the presence of the two additional pushers on the Casio WSD-F10 case I found that they are disabled when the watch screen is not activated. That means you need to first activate the screen and then push them. It means an additional step, and I hope that perhaps in a future software update you will be able to directly push them without having to first press the middle button.
Casio employs a dual LCD screen technology which means that the Casio WSD-F10 has an always-on screen (which can be disabled, of course, to save more power) that indicates the time and date at all times. I don't say this lightly, but the watch would not be nearly as interesting to me without this added layer of functionality. This isn't the only Android Wear smartwatch to use this tech, but Casio does it very well. I first experienced this when looking at the more expensive TAG Heuer Connected Android Wear smartwatch here.

While I love my Apple Watch, I have to say that I dislike looking at a blank watch dial as it makes the device lack soul. The Apple Watch comes alive nicely when you are using it, but it and other smartwatches that do not have an always-on state option will be vestiges of the past before long, in my opinion. The future of smartwatches - as simple as it might seem - is in them having always-on states where you can read information on the dial at all times whether or not the main screen is on. Once you get to experience this, you'll not likely want to go back.

Casio doesn't seem to let you adjust the look of the always-on state screen, which is a shame. I say this because, for me, one of the most enjoyable things to do with a smartwatch is regularly change the dials. I feel that the value a lot of major brands such as Casio bring to the smartwatch space is their years of experience designing attractive and functional watch dials. The Casio WSD-F10 comes pre-loaded with stock Android Wear watch faces as well as a few of their own which most people will prefer. There are moderate levels of color and functionality customization in the screens, but I personally thirst for more. I would gladly even pay extra for well-designed new watch faces, and I want them to come with even more personalization options aside from a small handful of color choices. If you are going to offer a watch dial that allows for customization, then go for broke.

Of course, people can download any number of third-party watch faces to any Android Wear device - that isn't the point. What I am asking for is well-designed and nicely curated watch faces from the brands I love... but with a lot of choices among them. To keep things interesting, Casio would easily benefit from releasing new watch faces for the WSD-F10 (available though its app) each month.
In terms of durability, the Casio WSD-F10 is water-resistant to 50 meters and is said to satisfy military MIL-STD-810 durability standards for shock and environmental resistance. Let's be clear that a Casio G-Shock would win in a fight, but the Casio WSD-F10 can more than hold its own in the wild compared to many other currently available smartwatches. This is the first smartwatch I've personally worn that I feel like I want to rough and tumble a bit.

Going out in nature with the Casio WSD-F10, the device feels at home with a bright screen that is easy to see in direct sunlight and useful features. With that said, you can see the battery life drop over the course of a few hours which reminds you that this is still a device that needs to be tethered to a charging port each day. Casio uses a proprietary charging cable, and if you lose it, then you aren't gonna have a good day. I've actually spoken to a scary amount of people who've simply lost their smartwatch charging cables. In the future, something needs to happen where these devices don't need extra accessories to carry with you in order to charge them.

The limited battery lifespan on the Casio WSD-F10 is not the fault of the device or Casio, but a natural drawback given the state of smartwatches today. I almost want to wear a more traditional light-powered Casio sports watch in addition to the Casio WSD-F10 as a backup device. When Casio and other brands are able to offer full smartwatch functionality without having to connect a host smartphone device and offer a few weeks to a few months of battery life, then I promise you these devices will be adopted by mainstream consumers in truckloads. There is just so much inherent possibility and fun you can have with a device like this and the apps.
Sometimes, I like to turn off phone notifications altogether and just use features like weather and map data or more complicated sensors' data applications to remind me of what smartwatches make available that even traditional Casio sport watches cannot. I find that a lot of the haters who dislike smartwatches simply haven't played with them enough to tweak their operation to best suit them.
In many ways, this is not the fault of consumers, because the devices themselves are still not designed with perfect user interfaces. For instance, to fully control the watch, you need to use both the onscreen settings, the Android Wear app on your phone, as well as the Casio Moment Setter+ app. That is essentially three pieces of software, and simply too complex for mainstream consumers. Eventually, this will all be refined - this is Casio's first smartwatch, after all.
When it comes to design, I have no problems with the look of the Casio WSD-F10 despite its gorilla-size (that I find charming a lot, actually). The interface of the software that Casio designed is generally very good and useful, and I like how they are branching out into new aesthetic codes when it comes to how they are designing the screens. I'll say that the Casio software and screens look far sexier than the stock stuff you'll find in Android Wear.

There really aren't many drawbacks to the device which aren't inherent to current Android Wear or smartwatches at this time. Of course, there are more features included in Android Wear that I am not covering, but it doesn't make sense for me to re-review the operating system each time I talk about a new device. Casio's debut entrant into the smartwatch space is a solid effort worthy of the Casio name, and I know this is just the beginning. It does command a slight premium price over some other Android Wear smartwatches, and even the base Apple Watch sport. With that said, you do get some extra functionality and it still costs 1/3 of what the TAG Heuer Connected does.
You'll find lots of little gems to enjoy in what Casio designed for the WSD-F10, and while it doesn't replace their existing world of smartwatches, it signifies the birth of a very important new family of products from the extremely capable Japanese watch maker. Price for the Casio WSD-F10 smartwatch is $500wsd.casio.com
Necessary Data
>Brand: Casio
>Model: WSD-F10 (WSD-F10BK as tested)
>Price: $500 USD
>Size: 56.4mm wide
>Would reviewer personally wear it: Yes.
>Friend we’d recommend it to first: Outdoors guy or gal comfortable with Casio and ready to see how connected technology aids their adventurous pursuits.
>Best characteristic of watch: Attractive, sporty design in a well-built case with welcome extras such as "triple sensor" technology that Casio brings to the table. High-quality, in-house-designed watch faces, but there could be more of them with more customization.
>Worst characteristic of watch: Normal pitfalls of current Android Wear devices including battery life and sometimes cumbersome ways of adjusting settings. Large size of case might turn off some despite comfortable wear on the wrist.

Swatch Sistem51 $150 Mechanical Watch


The Swatch Sistem51 was announced at Baselworld 2013, and as a true revolutionary concept should, it moved just about any and all watch enthusiasts on this planet. It amazed with its futuristic, fully mechanical movement that contains only 51 parts and is fully assembled by robots from start to finish. By contrast, it upset us with its extremely limited availability mainly restricted to Switzerland. With early July, that is bound to change, however, as the Swatch Sistem51 hits the US market, first in two pop-up stores in New York and San Francisco.


We see just about all truly innovative watches debut cursed with two key issues: their often stupendous price premium and an overly limited availability. With the Swatch Sistem51 and its more than competitive 150 Swiss franc price point, the former has always been out of the equation, while the problem linked to its availability has remained. It has been more than a year now that Swatch announced the watch at Baselworld 2013, and yet it took over six months for the first pieces to make it to the stores in Switzerland, in December.
The primary cause of all this delay has likely been the combination of the Sistem51's bold new construction and the unprecedented, 100% automated manufacturing process behind it. These challenges made it difficult for Swatch to increase its production output, forcing them to restrict the new model's availability to Switzerland and a few other select locations around Europe.

Well, the wait is over as Swatch finally brings the Sistem51 to the United States: on July 1st it will first be available in the US at the brand's flagship store in Times Square, located at 1528 Broadway. A week later the West Coast – well, San Francisco, to be exact – will receive its first shipment of the Swatch Sistem51, hitting Swatch's pop-up store at 101 Grant Street. Swatch plans to celebrate the occasion with installations dedicated to some of the key features of the watch, namely the unique "single central screw" around which the entire movement is built, as well as the peculiar striping that is present on some Swatch Sistem51 case back designs.


ther than the two July dates for New York and San Francisco – again, the 1st and 8th of July, respectively – Swatch communicates no exact schedule for when and how it is making the Sistem51 more widely available in the United States. What we managed to learn, however, is that they expect a nationwide roll-out as well as e-commerce availability to happen by the end of summer of 2014. The price for the Swatch Sistem51 in the US will be $150swatch.com










Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 review

This ultra-light Android tablet is the latest iPad challenger


Update: Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 is a lot like an iPad, except it has had a price drop, unlike Apple's always-pricey tablet. The review has been revised to reflect this change.
When I first wrote about the Samsung Galaxy Tab S2, my dad remarked of thenews story, "So, I heard Samsung is making a new iPad?"
This perfectly sums up how average consumers view tablets as a product category. Apple now makes the Kleenex or, in the UK, Sellotape of tablets, and they're called iPads.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 doesn't do much to differentiate itself, aside from running Android, with two new screen sizes that match the iPad Air 2 and iPad mini 4 in a 4:3 aspect ratio.
Prices were also identical, launching at $499 (£399, AU$599) for the 9.7-inch tablet, and $399 (£319, AU$499) for its 8-inch mini equivalent. However, you can find them on discount in the US starting at $399 and $299, respectively, and Samsung's devices start at 32GB of space, while Apple's entry-level models are still a paltry 16GB.


Regardless of the price changes, they're still a lot a like. It's really no wonder as to why there's mainstream confusion. Samsung and Apple are making phones that mirror each other more, if you look at the iPhone 6S and Samsung Galaxy S6.
The good news is that, once I got to hold the Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 in my hands, I discovered some differences that favor Samsung's new tablets, and a few that do not.
Weight, design, and software features make the new Galaxy Tab one of the best tablets to date, even though the slate looks like it's doing its best impression of an iPad, and isn't too different from previous Samsung tablets.

Design

The Galaxy Tab S2 feels nicer to hold in two hands than the Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 and its sibling, the Galaxy Tab 8.4. In fact, it's now light enough to comfortably clutch in one hand.

Weighing just 389g for the 9.7-inch tablet and 265g for the 8-inch version, it sheds the extra weight of its Samsung tablet predecessors, and it's also noticeably lighter than Apple's entire iPad line.
That's a big deal, believe it or not, because holding the larger Tab S2 in its ideal position – in bed reading Flipboard while holding the tablet in the air – isn't a strain over long periods of time.
Similarly, if you throw this tablet in a backpack it feels like no extra weight has been added. It's easy to store and effortless to hold, even with its near-iPad dimensions.
The 9.7-inch version measures 237 x 169 x 5.6mm, and the 8-inch model 199 x 135 x 5.6mm, beating Apple's sub-pencil-thin thickness of 6.1mm.

The Samsung Tab S2 is lighter in part because it's backed by a soft-touch plastic cover instead of an aluminium shell. Metal edges outline the tablet instead of a plastic frame this time.
The entire device may not be metal, but it does feel smooth. It's better than the dimpled plastic of the Samsung Galaxy Tab S, yet remains just as grippy.

Two small, springy buttons are embedded into the back of the Tab S2, but they're meant for clipping a cover onto the tablet and aren't releases to pop off the back. It's all sealed shut.
There is, however, a microSD card slot on the frame to optionally boost the 32GB and 64GB configurations with an additional 128GB of expandable storage.
Alongside this same rail are a solid-feeling power button and volume rocker. Stereo speakers, a headphone jack and an off-center micro USB port line the bottom of the tablet.
The Tab S2 has a physical, fingerprint-sensing home button in front with the usual oval shape, and two capacitive buttons on either side. These keys light up by default every time the display is touched.
The beams of light are a bit distracting when scrolling and reading text near the bottom of the screen, and turning them off in settings doesn't help orient your fingers in the dark. This wider tablet isn't like a narrower phone, where you know the exact location of these keys.
The latest Galaxy Tab comes in three colors: Black, White and Gold. Gone are the fancy names like Dazzling White and Titanium Bronze, reflecting Samsung's minimalist design with this year's ultra-thin tablet.

Display

Samsung has the best displays among smartphones with its Galaxy S6 and Note 5 handsets, and the same is mostly true of the Samsung Galaxy Tab S2.

It boasts a bright Super AMOLED screen with vivid colors and a 2,048 x 1,536 resolution that matches the iPad Air 2 and iPad mini 4. That's good, but not the best from Samsung.
The Galaxy Tab S slates had a resolution of 2,560 x 1,600 with more pixels per inch. The Tab S2 is technically a step down, even if you can't notice at first glance.
What happened? While the S1 sported a narrow, movie-friendly 16:9 aspect ratio, the new Tab S2 is wider, with a letter paper-sized 4:3 aspect ratio. It's more suited for web browsing.
Samsung dialed back the resolution in its rejiggering of the screen, but that the pixel count shouldn't concern you as much as the aspect ratio, especially for widescreen movie watchers.
The Galaxy Tab S2 display is still really sharp and vibrant, but has a different objective that's bent on three things: web surfing, Flipboard reading and iPad rivaling.
he Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 takes some cues from the Galaxy S6 and Note 5with a slimmer and lighter profile, but it doesn't quite inherit the same internal hardware.
At the heart of the new tablet duo is Samsung's Exynos 7 5433 octa-core System-on-a-Chip that combines another 1.9GHz quad-core processor with a 1.3GHz quad-core processor.
Clock speeds are the same as the last-generation Galaxy Tab S and don't reach the Galaxy S6 and Note 5 performance levels, but its ARM-based cores have been upgraded in a year's time.
The same applies to the graphics chip and RAM found inside the Galaxy Tab S2. It has a Mali T760MP6 GPU that's new to the Samsung tablet line, but that's still a step behind its phones. The RAM remains 3GB of LPDDR3, instead of the 4GB of LPDDR4 RAM in the Note 5.

Performance

Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 shows performance gains over last year's tablets, but its benchmarks trail the iPad Air 2. Running Android 5.0.2, its Geekbench 3 scores averaged a healthy 4,077.
That means it's slotted itself right in between Google's Nexus 9 tablet with a score of 3,492, and Apple's iPad Air 2 with a tablet-defining score of 4,506.















What's interesting is that, while Samsung is a bit clock-speed-shy with its tablet chipsets, Apple in contrast goes all out with its iPads. The iPad Pro has its highest-end A9X chip.
The Galaxy S6 and Galaxy Note 5 topped the charts on our benchmark rankings, while Apple's iPhone line has always fall short. The iPhone 6S and iPhone 6S Plus stick have a new, but more conservative A9 processor.
The good news is that the Galaxy Tab S2 is still a snappy performer when TouchWiz doesn't bog down the interface, and the operating system consistently stays out of the way here.

Internal storage

Better yet, Samsung makes a fair trade-off with the internal storage specs. All of Apple's devices begin with 16GB of storage for the same (and at some stores, cheaper) price as Samsung's 32GB phones and tablets.
That's more important to many file-hoarding consumers who have gigabytes worth of music, photos and apps stored locally, than a tablet that ekes out a win when it comes to processor performance under pressure.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 comes with Android 5.0.2 out of the box, but the operating system can be upgraded to Android 5.1.1. It was ready to go for me immediately.
This version of Android Lollipop is almost latest release, as the Android Marshmallow update is making its debut on Google's Nexus 6P and Nexus 5X, along with older Nexus devices.
That won't matter too much, because Samsung has already made a bunch of tweaks to Google's lockscreen notification-infused software through its always-meddling TouchWiz interface.
amsung is ahead of Google's software update by incorporating a component fingerprint sensor into the home button. It also allows its devices to be silenced from the volume rocker.
Google stripped this function from stock Lollipop and is bringing it back in Marshmallow. Its current phones and tablets devices stop short, toggling between volume and vibrate via the rocker.
Splitscreen mode continues to be a big part of Samsung tablets, and multitasking works best on the larger Galaxy Tab S2. A long press on the "recent" touch key quickly divvies up the screen.

Apple's new iOS 9 operating system adds true multitasking for the first time, but its half-and-half "Split View" is reserved for the iPad Air 2iPad mini 4 and iPad Pro and works with only a few apps at launch.
There's potential there for Apple, but Samsung does it the best for every app I've tested – except Flipboard. The magazine news reader isn't compatible with splitscreen mode.
However, I've become a big fan of swiping to the leftmost homescreen on Samsung devices and becoming caught in the latest news presented in a beautiful Flipboard layout.
It's really how Apple should arrange its leftmost iOS 9 menu, bringing the new Apple News app out from the shadows. Of course, now that I've said it in a Samsung review, it'll never happen out of spite.

Apps

This is where Samsung is known for its Android meddling: giving you apps you never wanted and never asked for. The company has learned its lesson in the last two years – to an extent.

Tab S2 contains useless Internet, Email, Memo apps, even though it also has Android-required Chrome, Gmail, Drive apps. Gallery is a bit faster than Google Photos, so that's a keeper.

Well, they're all really keepers because you can't delete many Samsung-made apps: Contacts, Gallery, Camera, Music, Video, Clock, My Files, Smart Manager, Calendar, SideSync and Galaxy Apps (in case you want more of these) are all stuck on your Tab S2.
It's a pain, because who wants their app drawer stuffed with generic Internet or Email apps? I did find uses for transporting files via SideSync and playing movie files more quickly through Video, but it should really be up to me to decide which apps stay and which ones go.

Samsung also throws in a bit of bloatware, for better or worse. There's a Microsoft apps folder full of Office, Skype and OneDrive apps, its own Samsung Milk Music, Samsung+, Screen Saver, a CNN for Samsung and Next Issue apps.
Thankfully, while Samsung would love to steer you into downloading new apps through its Galaxy Apps store, it includes the Play Store in the app drawer.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 battery life is also underpowered when compared to Apple's iPad Air 2 and last year's Samsung Galaxy Tab S.
Its battery capacity is the smallest of the three tablets at 5,870mAh and 4,000mAh for the 9.7-inch and 8-inch models, respectively. The iPad Air 2 has 7,340mAh, while Samsung's own Galaxy Tab S1 packed in a 7,900mAh battery.
Samsung's 9.7-inch tablet did better than I anticipated in our routine battery life test, thanks to its power-saving "big.LITTLE" CPU configuration. But it could've lasted even longer.
Running a 90-minute HD video loop at full brightness, it slashed the battery life by to 84%, which actually beats the Nexus 9, iPad Air 2 and ties the Dell Venue 8 7000.
Beating the Galaxy Tab S2 was last year's Samsung tablet, the Galaxy Tab S1, which saw a decline to 87% from a full charge during the same 90 minutes of HD video.

I still felt like the newer tablet could've lasted longer in day-to-day use outside of our battery life test, and that might happen with the Android Marshmallowupdate.

Google's Android update has a special Doze mode that retains more battery life when devices are in a sleep state. This is something Apple's iPad line does well, and is almost certainly why I feel like the iPad Air 2's real-life longevity is closer to the Tab S2 battery life than lab tests show.
I expected more from the Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 when it came to charging, too. It takes about four hours to fully juice up, and there's no fast-charging capability here. Wireless charging is also absent.
All of a sudden, that Samsung wireless charging pad with 1.4x the charging speed is less of a value outside of your Samsung Galaxy S6 or Note 5 phone.

Camera

You're not going to (or shouldn't) use them, but the Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 has two cameras: one on the back that's 8 megapixels (MP) and one on the front that's 2.1MP that you're hopefully using for video conferencing and now selfies.
The 8MP camera is OK with enough light, but can't compare to any camera inside Samsung's phones. It doesn't inherit that 16MP sensor we've grown to love in the S6 and Note 5. The 2.1MP camera photos look even noisier and should be avoided at all costs.
The rear camera can now shoot 1440p video at 30 frames per second, up from the 1080p video from the Tab S1, but don't look for a 4K video option. Such high-resolution video isn't ready for Android tablets yet.
Take it into an indoor setting, however, and you get lots of noise
Samsung does bring the now-familiar interface of its camera software to the Tab S2. But, while the layout is the same, features like wide selfies, RAW files and YouTube Live are missing.
How does the Galaxy Tab S2 look compared to the rest of the market? Here are some other choices you may prefer to Samsung's latest attempt.

iPad Air 2

We love the iPad Air 2 – there's no denying that, it's one of favorite tablets out there and it's hard to go wrong with this slate. But it is a little more expensive than the Galaxy Tab S2, and has a very different set up to Samsung's slate.
It may over a year old and the iPad Air 3 is near, but the iPad Air 2 has one of the best screens around and the processing power that would impress any tablet owner. But the Galaxy Tab S2 does hold its own against the iPad Air 2 with another powerful processor set up.
If you enjoy iOS on a tablet though, this is probably your number one choice as it's running iOS 9.1 and offers the best overall experience.

Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet

Sony's Xperia Z4 Tablet is probably the most suited piece of competition compared to the Galaxy Tab S2. Sony has done really well in its latest tablet by including a 10.1-inch 2K display in a beautiful design that's slimmer than we've seen before from the company.
It runs Android and is set up with the ugly Sony UI, but it does come with PS4 Remote Play to make up for it. It means you can play your PlayStation 4 on your 2K screen anywhere in the house, and one day you could maybe even play it on a different internet connection.
The keyboard is also nicely set out so it's easy to work from the Xperia Z4 Tablet – if you're looking for something a little more premium than the Tab S2, then maybe go for Sony's best slate yet.

Nexus 9

Sitting just between the two different screen sizes of the Galaxy Tab S2, the Nexus 9 comes with an 8.9-inch Full HD display. It impressed a lot of people when it first launched and it employs the same 4:3 display ratio as the Galaxy Tab S2.

The speakers on the Nexus 9 are particularly impressive, but you'll need to go for a larger storage version as the Nexus 9 doesn't come with a microSD slot.
Plus the design isn't anything special, especially if you're not a fan of the traditional Nexus look. But the price is a big factor, it's dropped a lot in the last year. This could be the tablet you want if price is an issue.

iPad Mini 4


Apple's third Mini tablet was a bit of a let down without adding much new apart from Touch ID, but the iPad Mini 4 has made up for that stumble. If you're looking for a tablet closer to the smaller slate in the Galaxy Tab S2 range, this will be your choice.
Much like the iPad Air 2 it comes packing iOS 9.1 – with possibly the best tablet app line up out there - and a beautiful screen. But this time it's in a smaller package with a 7.9-inch display.
There's no 3D Touch here though like we were hoping for from Apple, plus it's still running on an older processor set up so it's not exactly perfect. But that said, this is the best smaller tablet you can buy right now… if you're willing to pay Apple prices.
Is the Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 enough of an upgrade over the company's 2014 tablet? It's certainly has a new shape and it's thinner. In this way, it mimics theiPad Air 2, but not in enough areas.

We liked

As Samsung's thinnest and lightest tablet, the Galaxy Tab S2 is easy to tote around. Its 9.7-inch model's weight fits in between the iPad Air 2 and iPad mini 4. Its 8-inch tablet is even lighter. Yet it upgrades to a metal frame, keeps the microSD card slot and uses a more comfortable, soft touch plastic back.
To Samsung's credit, the TouchWiz software doesn't get in the way of Android 5.1.1 too much, and it includes extra features, like a fingerprint sensor in the home button and multitasking. The Tab S2 is not as powerful as it could be or as long lasting, but it's enough for a consumer tablet.
Why Pay Full Price? Get 50% off. Shop Online Now & Save!

We disliked

Besides the svelte design and slight specs upgrade, the Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 isn't always better as much as it's different from the Galaxy Tab S1. The tablet is less powerful than an iPad Air 2 and has a smaller battery compared to Apple's tablets and Samsung's own tablet from last year.

It's not best for movies, either, with its more boxy 4:3 screen, instead of a wide-screen-friendly 16:9 aspect ratio. That makes it a matter of taste, but no one will like the fact that Samsung backed off the pixel count in the transition to the new screen shape.

Final verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 is a lightweight tablet that's a lightweight upgrade over the 2014 Galaxy Tab S. Andbeyond the thinner and lighter design, it can't keep up with the iPad Air 2.
There's still plenty of reason to invest in this reading and web surfing-friendly tablet. Its size and shape is better suited for everything but video, and for some, that's a big plus.
It has stronger multitasking functionality to rival iOS 9 and features that Google isn't premiering until the Android Marshmallow launch. Samsung is slightly ahead of other Android tablets, even if this year's update is as small as the form factor is thin.